Intermediate Algebra
Tutorial 41:
Rationalizing Denominators and
Numerators
of Radical Expressions
Learning Objectives
|
After completing this tutorial, you should be able to:
-
Rationalize one term denominators of rational expressions.
-
Rationalize one term numerators of rational expressions.
-
Rationalize two term denominators of rational expressions.
|
Introduction
|
Tutorial
|
Rationalizing the Denominator
(with one term)
|
| When a radical contains an expression that is not a perfect root,
for example, the square root of 3 or cube root of 5, it is called
an irrational number.
So, in order to rationalize
the denominator, we need to get rid of all radicals that are in the denominator. |
| Step 1: Multiply numerator and denominator by a radical
that will get rid of the radical in the denominator. |
| If the radical in the denominator is a square root, then you multiply
by a square root that will give you a perfect square under the radical
when multiplied by the denominator. If the radical in the denominator
is a cube root, then you multiply by a cube root that will give you a perfect
cube under the radical when multiplied by the denominator and so forth...
Note that the phrase "perfect square" means
that you can take the square root of it. Just as "perfect
cube" means we can take the cube root of the number, and so
forth.
Keep in mind that as long as you multiply the numerator and denominator
by the exact same thing, the fractions will be equivalent. |
| Step 3: Simplify the fraction if needed. |
| Be careful. You cannot cancel out a factor that is on the outside
of a radical with one that is on the inside of the radical. In order
to cancel out common factors, they have to be both inside the same radical
or be both outside the radical. |
Example
1: Rationalize the denominator . |
| Step 1: Multiply numerator and denominator by a radical
that will get rid of the radical in the denominator. |
| Since we have a square root in the denominator, then we need to
multiply by the square root of an expression that will give us a perfect
square under the radical in the denominator.
Square roots are nice to work with in this type of problem because if
the radicand is not a perfect square to begin with, we just have to multiply
it by itself and then we have a perfect square.
So in this case we can accomplish this by multiplying top and bottom
by the square root of 6: |
 |
*Mult. num. and den. by sq. root of 6
*Den. now has a perfect square under sq. root
|
| Step 3: Simplify the fraction if needed. |
 |
*Sq. root of 36 is 6
*Divide out the common factor of 2
|
| Be careful when you reduce a fraction like this. It is real tempting
to cancel the 3 which is on the outside of the radical with the 6 which
is inside the radical on the last fraction. You cannot do that unless
they are both inside the same radical or both outside the radical like
the 4 in the numerator and the 6 in the denominator were in the second
to the last fraction. |
Example
2: Rationalize the denominator . |
| Step 1: Multiply numerator and denominator by a radical
that will get rid of the radical in the denominator. |
Since we have a cube root in the denominator, we need to multiply
by the cube root of an expression that will give us a perfect cube under
the radical in the denominator.
So in this case, we can accomplish this by multiplying top and bottom
by the cube root of : |
 |
*Mult. num. and den. by cube root of
*Den. now has a perfect cube under cube root
|
| Step 3: Simplify the fraction if needed. |
 |
*Cube root of 27 a
cube is 3a
|
| As discussed in example 1, we would not be able to cancel out the 3
with the 18 in our final fraction because the 3 is on the outside of the
radical and the 18 is on the inside of the radical.
Also, we cannot take the cube root of anything under the radical.
So, the answer we have is as simplified as we can get it. |
Rationalizing the Numerator
(with one term)
|
| As mentioned above, when a radical cannot be evaluated, for
example, the square root of 3 or cube root of 5, it is called an
irrational
number. So, in order to rationalize
the numerator, we need to get rid of all radicals that are in the numerator.
Note that these are the same basic steps for
rationalizing a denominator, we are just applying to the numerator now. |
| Step 1: Multiply numerator and denominator by a radical
that will get rid of the radical in the numerator. |
| If the radical in the numerator is a square root, then you multiply
by a square root that will give you a perfect square under the radical
when multiplied by the numerator. If the radical in the numerator
is a cube root, then you multiply by a cube root that will give you a perfect
cube under the radical when multiplied by the numerator and so forth...
Note that the phrase "perfect square" means
that you can take the square root of it. Just as "perfect
cube" means we can take the cube root of the number, and so
forth.
Keep in mind that as long as you multiply the numerator and denominator
by the exact same thing, the fractions will be equivalent. |
| Step 3: Simplify the fraction if needed. |
| Be careful. You cannot cancel out a factor that is on the outside
of a radical with one that is on the inside of the radical. In order
to cancel out common factors, they have to be both inside the same radical
or be both outside the radical. |
Example
3: Rationalize the numerator . |
| Step 1: Multiply numerator and denominator by a radical
that will get rid of the radical in the numerator. |
| Since we have a square root in the numerator, then we need to multiply
by the square root of an expression that will give us a perfect square
under the radical in the numerator.
So in this case, we can accomplish this by multiplying top and bottom
by the square root of 5: |
 |
*Mult. num. and den. by sq. root of 5
*Num. now has a perfect square under sq. root
|
| Step 3: Simplify the fraction if needed. |
 |
*Sq. root of 25 is 5
|
| As discussed above, we would not be able to cancel out the 5 with the
30 in our final fraction because the 5 is on the outside of the radical
and the 30 is on the inside of the radical.
Also, we cannot take the square root of anything under the radical.
So, the answer we have is as simplified as we can get it. |
Example
4: Rationalize the numerator . |
| Step 1: Multiply numerator and denominator by a radical
that will get rid of the radical in the numerator. |
| Since we have a cube root in the numerator, we need to multiply
by the cube root of an expression that will give us a perfect cube under
the radical in the numerator.
So in this case, we can accomplish this by multiplying top and bottom
by the cube root of : |
 |
*Mult. num. and den. by cube root of
*Num. now has a perfect cube under cube root
|
| Step 3: Simplify the fraction if needed. |
 |
*Cube root of 8 x cube
is 2x
|
| As discussed above, we would not be able to cancel out the 2x
with the 4 x squared in our final fraction,
because the 2x is on the outside of the radical
and the 4 x squared is on the inside of the
radical.
Also, we cannot take the cube root of anything under the radical.
So, the answer we have is as simplified as we can get it. |
Rationalizing the Denominator
(with two terms)
|
| Above we talked about rationalizing the denominator with one term.
Again, rationalizing the denominator means to get rid of any radicals in
the denominator.
Because we now have two terms, we are going to have to approach it differently
than when we had one term, but the goal is still the same. |
| Step 1: Find the conjugate of the denominator. |
| You find the conjugate of a binomial by changing the sign that is between
the two terms, but keep the same order of the terms.
a + b
and a - b are conjugates
of each other. |
| Step 2: Multiply the numerator and the denominator
of the fraction by the conjugate found in Step 1 . |
| Keep in mind that as long as you multiply the numerator and denominator
by the exact same thing, the fractions will be equivalent. |
| Step 4: Simplify the fraction if needed. |
| Be careful. You cannot cancel out a factor that is on the outside
of a radical with one that is on the inside of the radical. In order
to cancel out common factors, they have to be both inside the same radical
or be both outside the radical. |
Example
5: Rationalize the denominator  |
| Step 1: Find the conjugate of the denominator. |
| In general the conjugate of a + b
is
a
- b and vice versa.
So what would the conjugate of our denominator be?
It looks like the conjugate is . |
| Step 2: Multiply the numerator and the denominator
of the fraction by the conjugate found in Step 1. |
| Step 4: Simplify the fraction if needed. |
| No simplifying can be done on this problem so the final answer is:

|
Example
6: Rationalize the denominator . |
| Step 1: Find the conjugate of the denominator. |
| In general the conjugate of a + b
is
a
- b and vice versa.
So what would the conjugate of our denominator be?
It looks like the conjugate is . |
| Step 2: Multiply the numerator and the denominator
of the fraction by the conjugate found in Step 1 . |
| Step 4: Simplify the fraction if needed. |
 |
*12 is (4)(3) and sq. root of 4 is 2
*18 is (9)(2) and sq. root of 9 is 3
|
Practice Problems
|
| These are practice problems to help bring you to the next level.
It will allow you to check and see if you have an understanding of these
types of problems. Math works just like anything
else, if you want to get good at it, then you need to practice it.
Even the best athletes and musicians had help along the way and lots of
practice, practice, practice, to get good at their sport or instrument.
In fact there is no such thing as too much practice.
To get the most out of these, you should work the problem out on
your own and then check your answer by clicking on the link for the answer/discussion
for that problem. At the link you will find the answer
as well as any steps that went into finding that answer. |
Practice
Problem 1a:
Rationalize the Denominator.
|
Practice
Problem 2a:
Rationalize the Numerator.
|
Practice
Problem 3a:
Rationalize the Denominator.
|
Need Extra Help on These Topics?
|
All contents copyright (C) 2001 - 2008, WTAMU and Kim Seward. All rights reserved. Last revised on Jan. 8, 2002 by Kim Seward. |